Comments for Fairness Radio

Comment on Shifting the blame: a catalogue of conservative political violence by web hosting

web hosting — Thu, 16 May 2013 10:10:08 +0000

I believe this internet website has very good written subject material posts .

Comment on Danica Patrick breaks records at Daytona. Republicans, take note. by reputation changer

reputation changer — Thu, 02 May 2013 19:12:24 +0000

It’s remarkable in support of me to have a site, which is useful for my experience. thanks admin

Comment on North Korea: Kim’s target is internal, not the U.S. by Andrew

Andrew — Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:41:25 +0000

After the recent escalation in its rhetoric, the NK may have exhausted all the tricks it has in its bullying tactics.
It seems it is likely to face a situation where it would lose face when it is ignored by all others.
The international community should not resume or even consider to resume any talks with NK until it backs down by itself totally and completely.
China should reduce its trade and particularly aid with NK each time the NK plays bully, to make NK’s life more difficulty to send signals that its wayward bully will not work in its own interests but only the contrary.

Comment on Koch Brothers connection to Stalin by concerned citizen

concerned citizen — Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:52:59 +0000

Koch brothers kill real people. Anyone who supports them in any way is a puppet and accessory to murder.

Comment on Scalia should resign by Ian Reifowitz

Ian Reifowitz — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:24:59 +0000

Aha. That was you on dkos. Great post.

Comment on Another take on responsible gun ownership – insurance. by Tom Harvey

Tom Harvey — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:02:38 +0000

It’s possible to have good insurance which provides for everyone hurt, has the insurers discourage unsafe practices including letting one’s gun be lost or stolen and still is not too much of a burden on legal gun owners. It starts with requiring manufacturers to have a no-fault insurer that only gets off the hook when another insurer takes over. Lost or stolen or diverted guns are still covered by the last insurer. That makes it unnecessary to register guns or enforce the insurance purchase below the manufacturer level.
The total medical plus lost wages cost of gun injuries in the US per year is about $4 Billion with a loss ratio similar to car insurance that would be covered by about $8 Billion in premiums. Divided by 270 million guns that gives a cost per gun per year of about $30.00 Of course, that’s an average and some would cost more and some less depending on risk and other factors.
That’s for a no-fault kind of insurance that covers anyone injured by a particular gun. The liability insurance that available now from the NRA and others covers very few cases because the shooter is usually not a legal insured owner and the legal owner who lost control of a gun is not currently held liable.

Comment on Tea Party Support Collapses by Lawrence

Lawrence — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:17:10 +0000

The Tea Party collapsed because the Tea Party did not immediately continue its ascent after the 2010 elections. Instead of building a political movement it fell back and “let” the Conservative Movement coop it.

Lets look at some myths.

1. The 2012 election shows the waning of the Tea Party. This is wrong. The 2012 election showed the waning of everyone – the Tea Party not being that different from anybody and anyone else.

2. The Tea Party was and is a Conservative movement. Here is a tale of conservative and Conservative. Mitt Romney was and is a conservative man. He is not a doctrinal Conservative. He is, nevertheless, more conservative than Conservatives. Ditto the Tea Party.

Here is one example of how Conservatives (Movement or Establishment Conservatives) missed the boat. Hannity in discussion with Rich Santorum on earmarks with Hannity asking Rick Santorum why he supported several earmarks and Santorum saying that a true Conservative is to be found in their positions on spending, taxes etc.

Both are wrong. What was and is wrong with earmarks isn’t the earmark – its the earmark process that starts with lobbyist selling access and our tax dollars, and Senators dispensing largess to stay in power and side stepping the participation of the tax paying citizen in the process.

The legitimate value of lobbyists – and they have one – is to push for how commerce is conducted in these several states. Not to hire themselves out because through their access to Senators they can direct where our tax dollars go and how they get spent.

Moreover Movement Conservatives never understood this.

Comment on Will the Republican Party stay relevant? by Elias Bertel

Elias Bertel — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:11:18 +0000

alexdombroff@alexanderdombroff.com

Comment on Churches endorse candidates at their risk (but not from the IRS) by Chad

Chad — Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:07:13 +0000

I referenced this article in a blog post and newspaper publishing a while back. There is not electronic version of the newspaper article, but here is the link to the blog post – http://www.fairnessradio.com/2011/09/29/churches-endorse-candidates-at-their-risk-but-not-from-the-irs/

Comment on Beck compares reformed Judiasm to radical Islam by Michael Digerolamo

Michael Digerolamo — Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:00:36 +0000

If you are novice to private domain registration then you are certainly a Domainbie